By date 2008 (12 posts) July (1) May (6) Apr. (1) Mar. (1) Feb. (1) Jan. (2) 2007 (29 posts) Dec. (10) Nov. (4) Oct. (3) July (2) Mar. (3) Feb. (2) Jan. (5) 2006 (70 posts) Oct. (1) July (6) June (3) May (7) Apr. (14) Mar. (18) Feb. (18) Jan. (3) 2005 (75 posts) Oct. (3) Aug. (13) July (14) June (7) May (4) Apr. (7) Mar. (10) Feb. (10) Jan. (7) 2004 (60 posts) Dec. (9) Nov. (5) Oct. (4) Sept. (5) Aug. (1) July (7) June (7) May (11) Apr. (3) Mar. (7) Feb. (1) 2003 (18 posts) Dec. (2) Oct. (3) Sept. (5) Aug. (6) July (2) By category ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Tuesday, March 29, 2005
Dude, seriously. Try as I might to not let other people’s bad editing bother me, certain mistakes still fill me with rage. In this space, I vent that rage without pestering anyone who happens to be nearby. Feel free to skip this entry and come back later for more photos. ![]() OK, first thing: If you can’t distinguish between your and you’re, you have no business working on any publication of any type. I don’t mean to be harsh, and you’re probably a fine person with other great skills, but if its and it’s trip you up, find something else to do. ![]() Oh, and this one! Temperature … rising! Blood … boiling! There’s nothing like people writing down clichés and spelling them in way that displays an utter lack of understanding of the phrase. Like the “for all intensive purposes” people. You might skate by with that crap in conversation, but write “bears all” when describing a tell-all book, and you’ve proven yourself to be a boob. All images and text on this site ©2001–2008 Daniel Esch except where noted. |